کتاب: مبانی، الگوها و تکنیک های برنامه ریزی عصبی – زبانی

18284 دیدگاه

به گفتگوی ما بپیوندید و دیدگاه خود را با ما در میان بگذارید.

• OK — have been messing about with this thing for something like a few months now and it’s basically bookmarked at this point, so figured I’d write something up since a mate asked me a few days back. Am UK based, mainly do football and horses, small stakes, for context.

  What got me on it was genuinely a bit daft — I never could get my head round what an each way return would be with 1/5 odds a place. I used to just guess and then be surprised. These days I type the odds in before I place anything, even a simple single bet.

  The single bet calculator is the bit I use most — you put in the price and your stake and you get returns with no faffing, either odds format. It also handles the multiples — trebles maths, lucky 15 and lucky 63, patents and yankees, honestly that’s where most people I know mess it up. Have a go yourself, it’s here trixie calc and there’s no login wall, which I appreciated.

  What genuinely made a difference was the nerdier bits. They’ve got an odds-to-probability thing that shows the overround, plus a kelly calculator — I run quarter kelly because full kelly is far too aggressive. The dutch tool is handy too for when I’m spreading across selections.

  Not all sunshine though. Its layout is pretty plain — not much frills, looks like it was built by someone who cares more about maths than colours. On my phone it’s usable but the acca grid make you pinch and zoom. Also there’s no app, it’s a website and that’s it — fine by me just flagging it.

  Anyway. Doesn’t cost anything, no ads shoved in your face, does the job. Anyone who even now does the maths on paper, have a look — saved me plenty of “wait, that’s it?” moments.

  پاسخ

• So — been using this thing for something like four months now and it’s stuck on my phone, so thought I’d chuck my thoughts in since a lad on another thread asked me last week. I’m based in the UK, generally do football and horses, a fiver here and there, so take it how you like.

  The reason I started using it was actually embarrassing — I couldn’t ever get my head round what an ew payout actually came to when the place terms changed. I’d just guess and moan when the payout landed. Now I stick my stake in first, every time, even a simple single bet.

  Their single bet calculator tool is the one I open most — type in the price and your stake and it spits out profit and total return straight away, fractions or decimals. It also handles the multiples — acca and treble maths, lucky 15s, a yankee, which is where I always mess it up. If you want a look, it’s here matched betting oddsmatcher free and there’s no login wall, which I appreciated.

  One thing that genuinely changed how I bet was the geekier bits. There’s an probability converter that shows what margin’s baked in, plus a kelly criterion calculator — I stick to fractional kelly because full kelly is terrifying. The dutching one is decent if I’m splitting a race.

  Not all sunshine though. The interface looks pretty plain — zero polish, which honestly I don’t mind but some will. Phone-wise it works although the lucky 63 breakdown are a squeeze. Also there’s nothing on the app store, it’s a website and that’s it — slight shame but worth saying.

  Right, that’s me. Doesn’t cost anything, not plastered in adverts, does what it says. Anyone who still works out returns on a calculator app, give it a go — saves me plenty of dumb bets I’d have regretted.

  پاسخ

• So — have been messing about with this thing for about four months now and I keep coming back, so thought I’d say something since a lad on another thread asked me last week. I’m based in the UK, generally bet football and racing, nothing mad, for context.

  The reason I started using it was actually pretty stupid — I never could figure out what an e/w payout actually came to once you get five places instead of three. I used to just eyeball it and get a shock. Now punch the numbers in first, every time, even the boring singles.

  The single bet calculator tool is the bit I use most — type in the price and your stake and it shows profit and total return instantly, fractions or decimals. It also handles the multiples — trebles maths, lucky 15s, yankees, which is where I always got it wrong. If you fancy a poke about, it’s here bet calculator uk and it’s free with no account nonsense.

  The thing that actually changed how I bet were the more serious extras. The probability converter and it makes obvious the overround, and a kelly staking tool — I run quarter kelly as the full version is far too aggressive. The dutching one gets used a fair bit for when I’m splitting a race.

  Not all sunshine though. Its design is pretty plain — zero polish, which honestly I don’t mind but some will. On my phone it’s usable although the bigger tables make you pinch and zoom. And no app, it’s a website and that’s it — doesn’t bother me but you asked.

  So yeah. Costs nowt, not plastered in adverts, works. If anyone still works out returns on a calculator app, have a look — it’s saved me a load of dumb bets I’d have regretted.

  پاسخ

• Right — been using this thing for maybe six months now and it’s stuck on my phone, so thought I’d chuck my thoughts in since a lad on another thread asked me the other day. Am UK based, generally stick to footie and the horses, small stakes, for context.

  What got me on it was genuinely pretty stupid — I never could get my head round what an e/w payout actually came to when the place terms changed. Basically I’d wing it and get a shock. These days I type the odds in before I place anything, even the boring singles.

  Their single bet calculator tool is the bit I open most — type in the price and your stake and it shows the return with no faffing, fractions or decimals. There’s also the multiples — acca and treble maths, lucky 15s, patents and yankees, which is where I always got it wrong. If you fancy a poke about, it lives at odds format converter and there’s no login wall, which I appreciated.

  What really made a difference is the nerdier bits. The probability converter that shows the overround, and a kelly tool — I use half kelly as the full version is far too aggressive. Dutching calculator gets used a fair bit when I’m spreading across selections.

  Not all sunshine though. Its layout is very functional, let’s say — not much polish, looks like it was built by someone who cares more about maths than colours. Phone-wise it’s fine although the bigger tables need a bit of scrolling. And no proper app, it’s browser only — doesn’t bother me just flagging it.

  Anyway. Costs nowt, not plastered in adverts, does the job. Anyone who still works out returns on a calculator app, give it a go — saved me a fair few dumb bets I’d have regretted.

  پاسخ

• OK — been using this thing for about six months now and it’s stuck on my phone, reckon I’d say something since a mate asked me the other day. Am based in the UK, generally bet football and racing, small stakes, just so you know where I’m coming from.

  How I found it was honestly a bit daft — I could never figure out what an ew return would be once you get five places instead of three. I used to just guess and then be surprised. Now I type the odds in before every slip, even the boring singles.

  Their single bet calculator is the one I open most — you drop in your stake, the odds and it shows profit and total return straight away, fractions or decimals. There’s also the fiddly ones — acca and treble maths, a lucky 15, patents and yankees, honestly that’s where I’d always mess it up. If you fancy a poke about, it lives at treble bet — free, no signup.

  One thing that actually made a difference is the more serious extras. There’s an probability thing and it makes obvious what margin’s baked in, and a kelly staking tool — I use half kelly since full stakes are a quick route to a dead bankroll. Dutching calculator gets used a fair bit if I’m spreading across selections.

  It’s not perfect mind. The interface looks very functional, let’s say — not much polish, which honestly I don’t mind but some will. On mobile it’s usable but the lucky 63 breakdown are a squeeze. And no app, just the site — fine by me just flagging it.

  Anyway. Free, not plastered in adverts, does the job. If you honestly does the maths on paper, have a look — it’s saved me plenty of dumb bets I’d have regretted.

  پاسخ